Comment by em-bee | Hacker News Reader

Comment by em-bee | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

not at all. all it would require is the will to actually do it.

while you may have a point that in the current state, companies won't willingly reduce their profits to do that, and maybe the only way to get them to make this change right now would be force them and create a massive bureaucracy to make it happen, this is not the only way this can be addressed.

for one, our governments could support african countries in charging more for the product. this could be done through trade agreements that are more supportive and less exploitative as they currently are.

say for example the price of raw cocoa may have to triple to ensure that the producers at the end get double of what they are getting now. (i think that was what was needed to bring the income to minimum living standards)

how much governance is needed to make that happen? once the trade agreements are fixed, it should mostly be spot checking the market prices to make sure the money ends up in the right places. that can't be that hard.

> not at all. all it would require is the will to actually do it.

Oh the magical things that could happen if we all only had “the will to do it.” I can’t think of a more naively destructive idea.

And what shall the people of these countries do while they wait for their white saviors to develop the “will to do it?”

for the past half century poverty worldwide has been reduced drastically, and i see no reason for that trend not to continue.

public opinion on this topic continues to improve. the problem is not a lack of will in the individuals but a lack of awareness. and that is slowly changing, thanks to presentations like this one among others.

you see, just like you ridicule the belief that people can change and we can fix things, i could say:

ah, well, it is all hopeless. we will never be able to change the attitude of enough people for this to be ever successful. let's just give up. corporations will never change, and they will continue to exploit the world for their personal gain for the forseeable future.

HOW IS THAT ANY LESS DESTRUCTIVE?

nobody said anything about waiting. especially not for a savior. we all need to act. every one of us. to start holding corporations to account, and demand that they change their business practices.

that will does not come from nowhere. it comes from individual action.

i am talking to people almost every day to tell them what i am doing to improve lives of people in poverty, and what they could be doing as well.

you are free to choose to laugh at us, or you know, you could be doing something yourself as well.

the more of us become active, the sooner we can achieve a lasting change.

this is not an issue of white saviors rescuing africa. this is an issue of us colonialists cleaning up the mess that we created and are responsible for. that's why i am talking about change of trade agreements. we need to reign in our corporations and get them to stop their exploitative practices and we need to implement trade agreements that ensure that the resources we take out of africa are paid at a fair price. then it is up to african countries themselves to figure out how to invest that income to the benefit of their own people.

> for the past half century poverty worldwide has been reduced drastically, and i see no reason for that trend not to continue

Because of capitalism, not wealth redistribution from white saviors.

> this is not an issue of white saviors rescuing africa. this is an issue of us colonialists cleaning up the mess that we created and are responsible for.

You won’t do that, and anyone who waits around for that to happen or wasted energy or political capital engaging with that is a moron. A dangerous moron. For example, Britain will not give India back a cent of the trillions it stole from them, nor will the Muslim empires who came before them. The only non-idiotic course of action for a country like India is to try and get rich on the same course of development Britain pursued. Not sitting around with their hand out.

It occurred to me the other day that if my home country of Bangladesh had pursued capitalism from the outset, instead of fucking around for decades with socialism, my family might still be together in Bangladesh instead of scattered around a bunch of white people’s countries. What happened before doesn’t matter. What matters is economic development, as fast as possible. The prospect of white saviorism meaningfully fixing anything is so remote—because the sacrifice that would be required in their part is so massive—that even talking about it is destructive in distracting from the urgency of economic development.

What matters is economic development, as fast as possible

absolutely, yes!

but economic development also needs fair payment. and that is currently not happening.

fair trade is not wealth distribution.

do you think fast economic development is possible if we continue to exploit those countries?

> do you think fast economic development is possible if we continue to exploit those countries?

Yes, and it has already happened in many places. In 1950, the GDP per capita of South Korea and Taiwan were under $900, not much more than the $600 of Pakistan. Those East Asian countries rapidly industrialized and became rich. Nobody wasted time talking about fairness. Pakistan fucked around with socialism and other leftist garbage and doomed its people to decades more of poverty.

about south korea:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_on_the_Han_River

"The growth has been attributed to the hard work of the labor force. External factors include the enormous economic and technical assistance provided by foreign countries, particularly Japan (see: Treaty on Basic Relations Between Japan and the Republic of Korea) and the United States, access to Western and Japanese markets, and the acquisition of foreign currency by Korean migrant workers in the early stages of economic growth."

other east asian countries look similar. foreign investments and international trade play a large role in a countries economic development.

that doesn't look like continued exploitation that was and still is happening in africa.

sure, the countries need to do their part to develop on their own. but we can also contribute by actually trading fairly with them.

In the aftermath of WWII and the Korean War, the US invested significantly in rebuilding + supporting most of the rapidly industrialized countries that you've named.

Western Europe, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, all received extensive economic development support from the US from 1940's-1970's, which helped a lot with that rapid industrialization.

"The burden of a white man" - 2023 version.

if we want this world to improve we have to do something about it. that's what i believe is the very purpose of our life on this planet. if i want to have a better life for myself, i need to help making life better for others too. that's not a burden. for me that's a conviction, which is true regardless of what "the white man" did or didn't do.

i am not talking about making up for past sins. i am talking about stopping the exploitative trading that still happens today.

it's not the only problem in this world, nor is it only white people who are causing problems, but it happens to be the problem that we are discussing here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com