Because the resolution is theoretically unbounded but decays
exponentially if you don't do something stupid.
Two flip-flops in series is almost always enough to resolve the uncertainty.
However, I'm extremely skeptical of all the "metastability" fixes applied here. You only care about synchronizers when you change between unrelated clock domains.
Yes, the PDP-11 is before the advent of widespread knowledge about metastability. However, open-collector busses were not unusual at the time. Glitches were also understood. You set your logic transitions to cross boxes of your Karnaugh map correctly to avoid them. None of the given circuits seem to fix that at first glance, but I'd need to look at it in more detail.
I suspect the issue is that he is using flops instead of latches. Latches are level sensitive while flops are edge sensitive.
A lot of open-collector arbitration is more of something gets yanked down, you see something got yanked down so you also yank something down (this need to happen fast and is in hardware), then you release something if you don't have anything to say (this can happen slowly in software since you already yanked things and locked it), after everybody but one releases the bus arbitration is over and the winner can now proceed to use the bus.