So I'm still the target audience, you're wrong, and I'm not right, because I wasn't trying to make a point or win Internet Argument Points.
Why does every comment on HN need to be adversarial? I feel like it's a result of the rules being skewed to only comments that are "useful", and that leading to intellectual competition and constantly trying to "win" some point. Why can't we just share our thoughts without constant corrections?
Maybe you should walk in a more interesting environment?
Just my $0.02
When I met my wife she would consistently drink a pot of coffee around 8PM and fall asleep an hour later. Different people are wired differently.
I.e. "Some people don't need to walk 22 minutes a day, don't tell them to do so. Different people are wired differently."
Just as there is evidence walking 22 minutes a day improves lifespan for the /majority/ of people, drinking caffeine 6 hours before bed is considered negative for your sleep for the /majority/ of people. It's sound advice, even if it's telling someone what to do.
While I believe suggesting people be more lenient to other's life choices is good - it's a practice in empathy - sometimes people are misguided because the might not realize the impact of their actions, haven't thought about their actions thoroughly, etc. These mentions can be wakeup calls just as often as they can be negative/annoyances. I'd argue OP keep suggesting advice and instead we all try to keep open minds is the safer choice, for the /majority/ at least.
But putting the two together, walking whilst listening to podcasts works very well for me.
I used to take walks around the neighborhood during weekly meetings and 1:1s.