I'm not saying HFCS is good, but a sucrose-sweetened bread is likely just as bad for you as an HFCS sweetened bread, if the mass of sweetener is the same.
Edit: When I was at Google, I remember some employees complaining that the only free sodas were either HFCS-sweetened or artificially-sweetened. So, we later got some agave-sweetened free sodas. The things is agave nectar is 56% fructose. The most common HFCS grades are 42% and 55% fructose. Maybe agave nectar is maybe marginally more healthy, but really... if you're going to get that worked up, you're much better off training yourself to be content without the free soda. Drink soda, or not, but please don't fool yourself into thinking switching from 55% fructose to 56% fructose is a health intervention. Maybe people are afraid of trace residues from the HFCS processing, but all evidence suggests that the fructose is orders of magnitude more harmful than any ingested byproducts of the HFCS manufacturing process.
Most grocery stores also have a bakery though, and its far less common there.
In my limited searching I found an article that says the opposite, but they also don't provide any data[1]
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/nutrition/secrets-of-store-...
It would be nice if there was a database of food labels.
The search function and UI is terrible, though. There used to be a website self.nutritiondata.com that was amazing. Full calorie, carb, fat, and nutrient profiles on all manner of whole foods, plus lots of branded processed food labels as well. Apparently they had to take it all down because it was out of date. They got all of their info form the USDA link above, so the data still exists and there are other web apps out there that organize it for you, but they all pale in comparison to the old self.nutritiondata, sadly.