Restating their (apparent) point more explicitly: there are no technical skills that have probability 0% of being used; there are many (most) technical skills that have probability less than 100% of being used. There are cost-benefit tradeoffs to consider, but assuming the cost is low enough, it's better (useful) to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
I believe my lego play informed my career in software development, but that might be a stretch.
It is about coverage and opportunity in our lives.
The more skills one picks up, the greater the chance any one of them will make a big difference.
Here is a crazy example:
Paper tape. In the late 80's, I worked in some smaller shops using paper tape to drive their CNC machines. I learned all about it and can patch, the whole nine.
A few years ago a call for help found it's way to me and it turns out there are STILL people driving CNC machines off paper tape! I was able to fix the setup and get them running, edit a few programs and repair a damaged tape or few. Made a nice bit of extra cash.
Imagine how much better off our society would be if every adult was grounded in the fundamentals of political science, ethics, economics, and philosophy.
An educated electorate demands higher quality candidates. The populist demagogues of the last several decades wouldn't have stood a chance.