No comment on how instead of retaliating against the thieving website, he's retaliating against the –probably unknowing– users that just happened on those websites through Google?
(Some among whom are probably children)
(Some among whom are probably children)
But yes, won't somebody think of the children.
while one unrelated user is hurt in a substantial way (somewhere from pretty disgusted to mildly traumatized)
Does nobody see the obvious problem?
Just because people often say "think of the children" insincerely doesn't mean you should never think of them.