Why do some CEOs take such ... interesting(?) ... photos?
Is it supposed to present him in such a way (other than just me thinking that's odd)?
Is it supposed to present him in such a way (other than just me thinking that's odd)?
Yeah, that can't be it.
Searching his name instantly shows images with a mich more contemporary look, and somelooking 15+ years older than that of the article's image.
Furthermore the pic in the article lists his title as "Executive Director" and makes reference to his launch of a company in 2005.