People flat-out don't believe that the skills enumerated on my resume could be held by a single person, and are.
Apparently, I'm clearly "over the hill", having been at this for nearly 40 years. I should state that I have 20+ years experience instead, as-if having life experience doesn't actually make you better qualified to understand the contexts of any role in an organisation.
My skill-set is "threatening" to others, because, apparently, knowing things about a great many technologies means that I know more than the person hiring me, which somehow means that I'm a threat. As-if surrounding yourself by people who are smarter than you is suddenly undesirable.
I've been told to "dumb down" my resume because there's too much there, even if there's 99% chance that a computer will be the device actually reading it and selecting me. Apparently I'm supposed to "infiltrate" a company at a lower level and then "show" them that I can do more, despite 40 years experience showing that people only see the skills that they want to see.
According to some automated job technologies I have 104 years of experience. Not sure how that works.
Then there are those who want to know which of the experience is "professional" and which isn't. (I've been self-employed for the past 23+ years)
In the end, I liken it to this:
"How much experience do you have in eating food?"
"Do you mean, adding together each of the 15 minute meals, or how long have I been eating food for since I was born?"
"Okay, how much professional experience do you have eating food?"
"..."