iSponsorBlockTV v2: SponsorBlock for TVs and game consoles
github.com
github.com
I am convinced that being really aggressive about blocking advertisements helps with my ADHD and helps me focus better. I don't have science to back that up, just my anecdotal self-reported experience -- but I see improvements every time I get a little bit more purposeful about blocking ads (and not just ads but intros, boot screens, social reminders, suggested articles, etc -- basically interruptions). And when I see ads now that I'm no longer desensitized to them, they stick out so much and they're so hard to ignore. Our brains are good at filtering things out, but I do wonder if there's a focus cost in addition to a time cost. My mood improves when my house is clean and organized; my mood also improves when my media consumption is organized and de-cluttered.
I’ve been wondering about these… do people really need to be reminded to “subscribe like comment down below” in every single video?
Don’t people know the creator wants you to do it and only do it if they feel like anyway?
What’s the point of everyone saying it in every single video?
It’s just aggravating to me, but I wonder why they keep saying it?
Just give me the meat and give it to me raw
Fuck all of them, and fuck the average human's susceptibility to being brain-hacked like that.
(Yes, there's plenty of good content and presenters out there, but there's about 1000x more dressed-up trash that also seem to have an unexplainable gazillion-and-one appropriately named "followers").
He does it funny enough not to be annoying. Worst example on the other hand is Linus Tech Tips in my opinion
This looks interesting.
"You've saved people from 1,927 segments ( 16h 56.3 minutes of their lives )
You've skipped 5,500 segments ( 1d 9h 19.3 minutes )"
Absolutely ridiculous how much filler youtube is filled with to hit the 10 minute marks! I hope they never go down, it's a great free service.
On mobile phones we use vanced, on my nvidia shields we use smarttubenext. Both integrate with sponsorblock automatically.
I highly recommend the newest Walmart 4K ONN streaming box (official Google TV), which is an absolute steal at <$20.
I wonder how many of the open source clients have it built in.
https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/173jmog/youtu...
I once got an ad on one of their videos for a 45 minute long video of an air crash investigation from a copycat channel narrated by someone with a very similar voice. I got about 10 minutes in before thinking "wow, this is a pretty weak episode from this channel" before noticing what was going on.
(I don't mean to imply all air crash investigation style channels are copying this one. But that video was a straight copy of their style, narrative order, and even voice and speaking style).
Like Already__Taken says, if you go a while without skipping ads, youtube seems to intentionally show you longer and longer ads.
I have premium now, and while I enjoy it, I really feel like I got bullied into subscribing. If all the ads breaks were 60 seconds total or less I would have been fine staying a free user. But they punish me for not diligently having my finger ready to press "skip".
I don't care about NordVPN, Brilliant, SkillShare, or any other trash. I'm entirely less likely to use services that annoy me with their advertising.
Issue is that the UX isn't great (e.g. there are no playlists nor queues, and downloads don't work as well as they do on YouTube).
UX is pretty meh (although the "Nebula Enhancer" browser plugin at least fixes the missing queue), but that doesn't work in the app obviously
https://youtu.be/40Q7usuG2Cw?si=gfUS6TzIgNImTORX
On my phone so I can't easily timestamp but showing monetary amounts begins at 6:50
Brilliant, $4500 for 3 videos. Blinkist, $2000 for one video. VPN, specific brand not named, $5800 for a 90 second ad read. Raid Shadow Legends, $2000-6000 depending on if he's willing to dedicate time in his video to just playing the game on camera. Skillshare $2000 for a 90 second ad read.
The most interesting part to me was these are often not directly offered by these companies. They are from advertising partners who have a referral program with the primary company. So he would often get multiple emails to advertise the same product from different senders and offering different amounts of money.
Especially if they're small creators. There really is a threshold in advertising where a lot of indie creators are not going to be offered this kind of money.
I don't blame creators for doing what they need to do to make money, the state of advertising is not their fault. But as an ecosystem of users and developers and as an industry, we can make a choice about whether a system that encourages influencers to lie about product recommendations and directly influences their content and the topics they can talk about is more or less exploitative and regressive than asking people to give money to creators directly.
Advertising is often phrased as an alternative to regressive taxes on content -- it allows us to give content to people who couldn't pay otherwise. But advertising is itself a regressive tax; advertisers would not be paying any money for advertising if it didn't change purchaser behavior. And for the social cost of that regressive tax, content creators get very little payout in return. $2000-6000 for a video sounds good only because we're thinking about it in comparison to Youtube payout. But it's not very much money for a video that likely required multiple workers and several weeks to a month to produce.
It also blocks some audience-measuring redirects.
Overcast intro and outro skip is a thing (that I use for most podcasts), but I've never seen anything like an ad-skipping feature. I listen to the developer's podcast (Accidental Tech Podcast) and he mentioned that ad detection and skipping is something that he's looked into and considering, but as far as I know it's not an overcast feature today.
It does have configurable “skip forward” and “skip backward” _times_, and will skip to and resume from between words instead of inside words - so it’s easier to manually skip than in some other apps - but I don’t think there’s anything automatic.
[Edit: Oh! It can skip a configurable amount of time from the start and end of playback of any podcast! It’s still manual though.]
Adblocking is definitely the thing it's advertised on, but sponsored segments are only one labeled category. For longer lets-plays it's great to have the equivalent of Netflix's "skip the intro/credits" option. It is an adblocking extension first and foremost, but I still kind of recommend checking it out even if you don't plan to block ads with it because you might still find the other categories useful.
so do you sign on to any patreons for any of the creators you watched?
I literally just LOL'd and spit water at my screen reading that. They are the most condescending over the top waaaaay too long of a segment. Even in the 1950's, sponsors were just mentioned along the lines of "This segment is brought to you by Ovaltine. Remember to drink your Ovaltine!" and then moves right the fuck along. But nooooo, youtube sponsors took the SNL idea of play it until it's uncomfortably long, then keep going until it's just funny that they haven't stopped, but then continue until you just feel like a sad sap for continuing to have this product/service talked about like it is the second coming. Respectful. As. If.
I have even been introduced to services I pay for now via these segments. Nebula, Backblaze, DBrand, and Audible are some of them.
You weren't introduced to these services, you got advertised to. How many raid shadow legend ads did you sit through to hear about backblaze once? Did you ever hear about backblaze from a more reputable source? Did you consider alternatives to backblaze before paying for their services?
This teeters on the verge of being a shill's comment. This concept of "creators" being any different than any other social media "influencer" that is doing things for clicks/likes/subscribes opposed to "respecting" their audience is just farcical. Are there various degrees of their insincerity, of course.
I never drank the social media Kool-aid. I find it very disconcerting how many people from the social media generations actually believe that these "creators" shilling products are anything more than what they actually are.
I have YT premium and now this removed all the annoying integrated ads as well.
I'm not saying developer is doing that, but they have power to do so. This app sends every video you're watching to their api, https://sponsor.ajay.app/api/ , and they can do whatever they want with this data. When small apps like this becames popular, they start receiving offers from data brokers/malware business and sometimes developers sell the data or the whole app without even knowing that the data will be used for bad purposes.
Do you have any data to back this up
[1]https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.c...
[2]https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/datas...
This program registers a remote and automatically skips forward when a sponsorblock segment is present.
Thank you for the explanation @jabroni_salad : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37873749#37876128
> docker: no matching manifest for linux/arm/v6 in the manifest list entries.
Would it work on a raspberry 4 maybe or even a raspberry 5?
If not any of the above, is there a low power mini-pc type option that you recommend?
Thanks
(Wondering if this directly affects sponsorship revenue.)
Also why does this program need to be completely rewritten so many times to eliminate performance issues with the previous version?
Then I found an extremely detailed but very opinionated guide on how to setup a suite of apps with docker compose and ssh because the author's were very much against the GUI and built in apps. It's been a much smoother and easier experience installing services since I no longer need to seek out half baked guides on someone who got it working good enough for them on their NAS.