[flagged]
The content of the video that was linked, can be described as "in theory the universe was xyz so abc could have been a thing". Also known as non-serious entertainment.
Your link is irrelevant in this conversation, as the criticisms involved are entirely political. If the linked video was related to renewables, nuclear energy, etc then it might have been relevant.
The reputation and/or background of a source should not affect the criticism of the content.
If the content of an article or video is good, the reputation of the source is not that relevant.
Vice versa again, a outlet having a good reputation should not prevent you from judging a bad article as bad.
Either way I don't see why one should care about funding/sponsorship in the context of a "gee whiz" video.