It's not hard to find at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#USB_Power_Deliver...
5v3A is the limit of USB PD SPR.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#USB_Power_Deliver...
5v3A is the limit of USB PD SPR.
Here is another industry source which has a table that also says 5V at 5A: https://www.graniteriverlabs.com/en-us/technical-blog/usb-po...
In fact, using Wikipedia’s sources, I found the actual specs and here is another piece of supporting evidence for these other articles:
> The Fixed PDOs Maximum Current field Shall advertise at least 3A, but May advertise up to RoundUp (PDP/Voltage) to the nearest 10mA. Requires a 5A cable if over 3A is advertised.[0]
This is a footnote attached to 5V3A, indicating to me that chargers are allowed to offer more than 3A at 5V.
At a minimum, the spec seems to be ambiguously written, but I’ve only spent a few minutes skimming it. Multiple industry sources (previously linked) believe that 5V@5A is within the spec, even without using PPS.
[0]: “USB_PD_R3_1 V1.8 2023-04”
The first revision, rev 1.0, had six fixed power profiles: 5V/2A, 12V/1.5A, 12V/3.0A, 12V/5.0A, 20V/3.0A and 20V/5.0A. These were deprecated by rev 2.0, version 1.2, which instead introduced power rules at four fixed voltages, supporting power supplies with different output powers. The maximum supported currents by the specification were 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 15V/3A and 20V/5A. These power rules were retroactively named the Standard Power Range (SPR) in rev 3.1. That revision also added the Extended Power Range (EPR), which raised all the current limits up to 5A, but only when used with electronically marked cables. EPR also added power rules at 28V, 36V and 48V, again requiring (differently) marked cables and up to 5A. So 5V/5A is a valid option, but only when used with a USB PD rev 3.1 compatible power supply and cable.
Orthogonally to the fixed power rules, rev 3.0 introduced the Programmable Power Supply, which allows a configurable voltage between 3.3V and 21V in steps of 20 mV. This was extended by rev 3.1 with voltages between 15V and 48V in steps of 100 mV, called the Adjustable Voltage Supply. As far as I'm aware this is not commonly used, and most products advertising Power Delivery support use the predefined power rules.
What good is a universal port if it's not actually universal? I would actually prefer different shapes, because then you could be pretty confident that if everything fit it was going to work. Like how USB used to be.
Having a plug on say a laptop that can be a charger, a HID, a drive, a monitor, or all of the above with a docking station is vastly superior to the old day IMHO.
Unfortunately the cable to do that isn't cheap and is massively overkill for say a phone charger. Thus cable compatibility becomes a thing but looking at HDMI cable compatibility is always a thing.
I think the problem is what used to be complaints about niche connectors are complaints about USB-C and it feels different and more impactful even if it isn't necessarily.
After all I know back in the Mini-USB days you had manufacturers skipping the data pins to save some copper leading to frustration when you couldn't transfer files.
Besides Thunderbolt cables, there is not a standard nor universal way to identity them. I had to test each cable by plug in an SSD then speed test the SSD.
Flash back 15 years, a cable with MicroUSB either transfer data, or not. The difference between high speed / super speed only lives in the device.
A USB-C docking station will plug into many of my laptops, but only two will display anything on the screen.
Being able to pick and choose features like that is not user friendly. It will do everything except when they didn't feel like implementing it is not a good standard.
At least you get minimal functionality (why are you hoarding data less cables?) Better than having to go buy one because you have a billion micro USB but no FireWire to hook up that drive.
That's actually not a bad solution. The speed of a cable doesn't matter unless you have a device that needs to be fast.
The baseline profiles for power delivery (i.e. anything up to 20V@5A) have been all but done for two, three years now - you can readily buy combinations of PD and MUX chipsets that handle everything you can throw at them, and Anker has high-quality chargers to supply the juice.
The thing where USB-C still has issues is alternate modes. USBx usually works on all ports of a laptop or PC and virtually all cables, but anything involving TB, display, debug or audio is a hit-and-miss given how incredibly difficult it is to route all these high-frequency signals and properly mux them.
The simple fact that we can finally share charging cables across phones is a god send, not having a single cable for all phones was the stupidest thing people had ever done.
It’s such a mess that the EU took one look at it and said “let’s make that a universal standard and force it upon everyone!” Modern USB truly is the government bureaucracy of standards.
I believe there were discussions about potentially standardizing on Lighting if Apple relinquished it's tight control over the technology but they were not interested in that path.
The EU decided that Apple cannot dictate what cables are used to charge their phones to the degree of at one point charging manufacturers $4 per cable (to be fair it seems like Apple was providing the hardware so it wasn't a pure licensing charge).
If you're curious, my main objection to the EU is that I don't think USB-C is a good standard and I don't like the prospect of the whole industry stuck with USB-C longer than appropriate because there's no incentive to experiment and possibly come up with something dramatically better.
The reality is that with variable and programmable power supplies, it’s now up to the device to draw power at a balanced rate from the supply, instead of the “supply” pushing power in. Modern tech has allowed us to have supplies between 3V-48V, 500ma to 10A. All with a usbc head.