Also, will this go off on cellular watches? I'm sure schoolteachers are going to LOVE this... :-/
Also, will this go off on cellular watches? I'm sure schoolteachers are going to LOVE this... :-/
That this will be happening today has been publicly communicated for at least a few weeks (as far as I've noticed) now. If that's not enough time for people to realize that, if they want rest, or silence, or whatever, they'll need to turn their phones off around this time, then I don't know what to tell ya.
>Also, will this go off on cellular watches? I'm sure schoolteachers are going to LOVE this... :-/
Same sentiment as above. This isn't just happening to kid's devices, it's happening to teacher's/administrator's phones, too. It'd be no different than a timed emergency drill that folk in schools are anticipating; everyone knows it's coming, there'll be a few minutes of mild commotion, things will die back down.
This is the first I (and many others, see further up) have heard of it.
Apparently if you turn off your phone, the alert will play when you turn it back on. So if everyone in a hospital wing turned off their phone, the alert would “happen” multiple times as people turned their phones on later.
Edit: Not entirely true - it won't receive the emergency signal so long as you keep it off during the 30 minute window[1].
I dunno. Maybe there's no precedent for my worry. But it feels real.
Incidentally, in the UK the test messages could be opted out of, and a lot of people did. Presumably this doesn't stop the government from cranking the level up to unignorable if they wanted to, unless the big phone OS cos sensibly didn't give them that access level.
What are the good uses of a nationwide, rather than local and targeted, alert?
Hospitals are full of noise, one narrow time slice with an extra vurst isn't going to meaningfully change that.