Hacker News Reader

Comment by dralley | Hacker News Reader

>they're at least trying to figure out how to make money independent of Google, unlike Mozilla. Brave actually tries to create a monetizable web without ads, Mozilla literally relies on the status quo for all of its revenue.

1) Mozilla does have alternate sources of revenue, like Pocket and Mozilla VPN.

2) Mozilla had a partnership with Scroll, which was precisely that (a way of funding websites without advertising and taking a slice of that) before it got acquired by Twitter and subsequently dismantled.

View on HN

None of those strategies involve changing how the internet works. Website owners generally need to pay for their sites. Currently their payments are subsidized (sometimes to oblivion) by advertising. Mozilla is doing nothing to change that, Brave is.

You're right that they perhaps don't want to be reliable on Google themselves, although they are and all other ventures have failed, but that's different from wanting a web that is not driven by advertising.

> None of those strategies involve changing how the internet works. Website owners generally need to pay for their sites. Currently their payments are subsidized (sometimes to oblivion) by advertising. Mozilla is doing nothing to change that, Brave is.

But that's exactly what it was...

https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/02/25/exploring...

If you want to argue that they should have done it themselves rather than in partnership, or bought out Scroll, then sure, I agree. Especially given how it turned out after Twitter bought Scroll.

Ah thanks, I had never heard of Scroll. I guess it's nice that as of very recently they thought about this problem and then immediately failed.

> 1) Mozilla does have alternate sources of revenue, like Pocket and Mozilla VPN.

Not really though. All alternate sources are usually less then 5%. [1] As of 2021, they made 73% of total revenue from Google. [2] Mozilla VPN? You mean the one that refuses to fix CVEs? [3] Yikes. No thanks.

1:https://frankhecker.com/2020/08/15/how-mozilla-makes-money-a...

2:https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-invest...

3:https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/08/03/1

Sorry for the offtopicness (I'm a mod here) - I'm afraid I only just saw these posts of yours from a few weeks ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37376466 (Sept 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37372118 (Sept 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37367785 (Sept 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37357369 (Sept 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37345115 (Aug 2023)

Those comments broke the site guidelines so badly that I need to let you know that we ban accounts that post like that, and ask you not to do it again—no matter how badly someone else's comments are or you feel they are. We're really trying to avoid having this site burn itself to a crisp, which is what unchecked flamewar leads to.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

Fair enough.

Couldn't have emailed me though?

I prefer to post on the site—not to shame anybody, but because it's important for the community to see how HN is moderated and even to be aware that it is moderated. (It's surprising how many regular users don't know that.)

Understood.

I agree, I can get snarky. Although I don't quite agree with the strictness of the rules, this site is one of the most unique I have found, so something must be going right.

I'll respect the rules.

Appreciated!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com