Hard disagree. I'd take the sibling comment about enterprise users getting used to poor UX and take that a step further: most users anywhere expect poor UX and expect to be ignored.
Take the Github UI refresh (yes it's not an "app", but hear me out). They've literally reinvented the text display widget in the browser. One of the core things that a browser does and Github reinvented it.
Public feedback has often been quite harsh. After a long public beta, it still choked on multibyte characters, it's laggy, it doesn't respond to keystrokes the way a native app (or even the browser itself) does, sometimes it displays spurious characters, and in some cases creates blurry text. Users have had to point out how to deal with multibyte characters Javascript, someone recently complained of excessive eye strain because text is so blurry.
What has Github done in the face of that feedback? They've doubled down on their custom widget and largely ignored the reported issues.
> For that kind of developer experience to consumer satisfaction
Again I strongly doubt you're getting an accurate measure of customer satisfaction if you think folks don't notice non-native apps. Earlier today I was actually trying to think of larger mac-native apps released by not-Apple and couldn't think of anything. The closest I could think of was Fusion 360 and that uses Qt.
As much as I notice how janky VSCode and Signal are, I'm not going to bother providing feedback that Electron sticks out like a sore thumb. With Fusion, the only feedback Autodesk ever responded to was the whole "hey you're pointing customers at staging resources" thing. It's a bit of sunk cost fallacy and a bit of "good enough". By and large once a company has picked a tech stack they're not going to move away from it without some serious motivation.