Sure... As long as the army is following the government it's a non-issue. Billionaires are political/industrial/&c. power if you want but they're one "go get them" order away from disappearing forever. It just so happens that for now their goals are somewhat aligned with the gov's.
And even if the gov falls a lot of US three letters agencies are already semi or fully autonomous, and from the few things we know about them they don't fuck around.
Corruption exists, probably on a large scale, but it's not a single coordinated effort, it's more like an army of rats fighting for the crumbs. If even Mexico didn't completely fold against their drug cartels it's not the soy boy Musk & lizard man Zuck dream team who'll destroy the USA
The only way money can protect you is if you literally buy out the entire government, in which case you're basically a monarch.
But yes, that is cold comfort to us plebians.
Not that the Chinese are perfectly capable of building the same network on their own. Albeit with electronics' performance a transistor node older. Which is to say: almost the same.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_...
I'm sure they'll be allowed to build commercial satellites for other countries that contain a kill switch the military has access too. Military hardened satellite networks will be a non-starter other than maybe for some close allies like the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_...
I suspect the end game will be Tesla's collapse when his hype train hits a wall and other manufacturers perfect low cost vehicles, Twitter/X is already dying and SpaceX will get involved in an ITAR violation or conflict of interest and suddenly end up in the hands of Lockheed Martin or someone similar and him in front of the SEC for one last time.
The US gov would not want to look like they're intervening. They don't need to.
USG has more control if it's done by Starlink vs some other country's tech.