"do you know that you hate Jews or is it a blind spot to your own prejudice?"
That question embodies the logical fallacy of assuming the consequent, and that's all my remark meant. I wsn't commenting on the substance of the discussion.
That question embodies the logical fallacy of assuming the consequent, and that's all my remark meant. I wsn't commenting on the substance of the discussion.
Yes, that's clear; your original comment shows plainly that you interpreted my remark as antisemitic. It wasn't; it was pointing out a fallacy (and that formulation is nearly always used to point out that particular fallacy).
You can think what you like, of course; but screeching "antisemite!" based on nothing but your powers of telepathy is rather counterproductive.
I wasn't. I was calling out a fallacy. And upon reflection, in one short sentence you perpetrated TWO fallacies: you were also arguing ad-hominem.
When I encountered your leading sentence with it's fallacious construction, I stopped reading your comment. I've read your latest wall-of-text reply, stuffed with accusations of racism and antisemitism. I think it's fair to describe your attitude as "screechy".
I'm not interested in debating the substance of the G+P with you; your style of "debate" consists of smears, fallacies and abuse. Not playing.