The argument against net neutrality is that it might stifle innovation. Well, we had net neutrality for many years and innovation didn’t seem all that stifled. Hence, what’s the harm in bringing it back?
Since Congress won't do anything at the national level, this is going to be re-hashed out by the FCC every time the president's tie changes color.
Are these plans legal in California, or is the California law not sufficiently specific to rein in this kind of thing?
> The change will extend beyond California, since, AT&T said, “the Internet does not recognize state borders.”
(For the record I don't agree that this is unimportant, but you're arguing against a straw man.)
Political capital is limited. Instead of wasting it rehashing this bandaid, why not campaign for something like municipal internet that would fundamentally solve the problems of ISPs?