So you do agree extraterrestrial killing are justified if the country says so in advance.
So only India needs to do say aloud we are going to kill xyz and that is ok. No reputation lost am I right.
So only India needs to do say aloud we are going to kill xyz and that is ok. No reputation lost am I right.
Whether it's ok or not is a different matter. But it is definitely _different_ if you tell the whole world "if we find this person, and you don't hand them over and we have a warrant, we will kill them on your territory or not".
In this case, whoever is harboring the person of interest knows fully what's coming, and isn't going to be surprised by it. Citizens of the country might be unhappy about it, but they will understand that this was coming, and it was a risk and the government decided that they were going to run that risk.
Whereas killing someone of little significance and pretending like nothing. That's the stuff Russia does. So yes it's different, and the reputational impact is different.
> No reputation lost am I right.
No, you're not right and I'm not saying this.
Your orginal assessment is correct. Extraterrestrial are not justified and it applies to West as well and foremost USA. Whatever Russian have done I assume USA has done worse. That is its reputation!
I think you're simply not aware of the facts in this case. The Indian govt certainly appears to have done the first part of what you said, including putting out an Interpol notice.
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/punjab/canada-allowed-hard...
Meanwhile the Canadian govt lied about when he got Canadian citizenship, first stating on Twitter it was 2015, and the next day that it was 2007.