The result is not protobuf and doesn’t claim to be.
Looking at my employer’s protobuf runtime for our major programming language, we don’t even support it.
The result is not protobuf and doesn’t claim to be.
Looking at my employer’s protobuf runtime for our major programming language, we don’t even support it.
If your implementation doesn't support something in the reference implementation, that seems like your problem, not anyone else's.
[1] https://protobuf.dev/reference/csharp/api-docs/class/google/...
Because it’s not part of the protobuf specification, not part of a valid protobuf message, and framing is a transport/file format concern and should not be performed by default.
If someone is expecting to receive a protobuf-encoded payload, it must not include a framing header.
> If your implementation doesn't support something in the reference implementation, that seems like your problem, not anyone else's.
Someone else’s failure to follow the spec is not our problem.
https://protobuf.dev/reference/csharp/api-docs/class/google/...