It's quite possible "good enough" AI will trap us in a local maximum of mediocrity where the near-term ROI on thinking hard is too low.
It's quite possible "good enough" AI will trap us in a local maximum of mediocrity where the near-term ROI on thinking hard is too low.
Current training systems extract information on everything from every input. We don't read a cookbook to learn about space, but these models are twiddling weights all over these massive spaghetti balls of logic.
Looking at the data we have, the literal collection of all human knowledge and lamenting not having more is like standing on a ladder sideways.
But it's really starting to feel like pile of ladders is getting tall enough to bootstrap.
And these massive inefficient systems filled with data and churning matrixs will be set in order. And all the ladders laid end to end.
AI will also enable the collection of more data. For example, robots could do the labwork for science experiments in far greater numbers than humans could.
A massive amount of gibberish isn't _useful_ data.