Hacker News Reader

It seems to be going the other way in the US. Recently, in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, it was found that discrimination against customers who "violate your values", in that case by being gay, was fine.

View on HN

I’m not sure that case is relevant to the YouTube example, as YouTube isn’t refusing to or being compelled to create new works on behalf of Brand, or whatever the closest analogy here would be. Refusing service based on protected attributes tends to be far more explicitly addressed, in the US and likely many other countries.

If this is not a temporary reversal of ethics then this is part of The Fall.

Some of us are alarmed, some active, but nobody progressive thinks this is progress.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com