[flagged]
That something might be a plant or animal. As long as you _attempt_ to minimize the suffering of what you're consuming, then eating plants over animals isn't morally superior.
It also doesn't really matter if it's a cow, chicken or frog, as long as you're not making the animal suffer pointlessly.
Survival is justification for eating animals -> These people are bad because they eat animals but could eat non-animals to survive. Are you saying survival is justified to eat animals only if there are no other things to eat?