I am not sure why this is a problem. Looking at the organization of the resources directory of every project I've ever worked on, I am not sure I want more opportunity for physical and logical concepts to unnecessarily diverge.

Let's not hold ruby up as a poster child for modularity.

Yeah, I do like my IDE doing the tedious work for me. It's also really nice to unzip any JAR I need to troubleshoot and know exactly where to navigate to find exactly the file with the code I need.

I like Golang a lot but the standardisation and verbosity in Java-land has some benefits after you get used to it enough to learn to ignore the boilerplate, it's pretty good to have some kind of consistency enforced by the VM when working in large codebases.

I don't understand how it is doing stuff in the background.

You literally ask it to move some class and then it does it. And it's very obvious what it's doing.

Then you’d be thrilled to hear about all the stuff your NVME drivers are doing in the background without you knowing shit about it. Or maybe you prefer to engrave your ones and zeroes in stone by hand?

Abstractions exist for a reason. In Java, that abstraction is coding in classes and packages, not files of text.

True, but they are loaded by path.