The remains of this 5000 year old capital of Lord Krishna—-archaeologists have found walls, artifacts, and structures off the modern Dwarka.
The city holds immense mythological significance and ancient texts such as Mahabharat corroborate the existence.
From Wikipedia, with citations[0]: “Archaeological findings suggest the original temple Dwarkadhish Temple dedicated to Krishna was built in 200 BCE at the earliest.” Any reference to Krishna further back than that is mere legend, and considering that the name Krishna is etymologically from a language family that did not even reach India until more recently than five thousand years ago, your claim is preposterous on its face.
So much gets retconned with these apocryphal takes on how everything relates to Hinduism. So much of the rich history of the subcontinent has been reduced to religious politics.
There is so much cultural erasure in the name of religious vanity. I was raised Hindu but I just can’t relate to this religious fervour
It is laziness to cite a Wikipedia article without doing any research.
[0] https://www.theyucatantimes.com/2021/05/the-mythical-underwa...