So there is a limit to how much money can the bank create.
So there is a limit to how much money can the bank create.
Reserve requirements of that type still do exist in some places (though in some places they've been abolished) but don't really play much of a role in determining how quickly money supply grows any more.
Control over money supply growth is mostly down to interest rates these days.
Similarly, the role reserve requirements used to play in protecting depositors has been replaced by the various "Basel" rules which determine what sources of funding banks can use to fund their loans which depend on the loan book's credit quality, tenor etc.
Loans create deposits and the deposits just change ownership tag from then on.
A wad of cash isn’t money. It is nothing more than a receipt for a deposit held at an institution somewhere - that was created as an advance in the past in response to an equivalent loan.
When you deposit a wad of cash in a bank, the bank takes ownership of the deposit in the institution and creates a new deposit in the bank for you. It’s just another loan creating a deposit.
A loan creates an advance. That advance is the bank owing a person in return for the person owing the bank.
The advance is then used to pay you so you have a deposit. All that does is change the ownership tag on the advance.
Yes - via the central bank, right? I thought that was how quantitative easing worked.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-...
Absolutely false. For starters, in many jurisdictions including the US, the reserve fraction is now 0% and has been for quite some time.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/m...
They are nothing more than a centralised optimisation of what would otherwise be a full mesh network of point to point exchanges