Hacker News Reader

Comment by devjab | Hacker News Reader

I’m not GP but I would personally love for the smart watch to replace the smartphone so that I don’t have to carry one around. I know that’s sort of possible in some places, but it isn’t where I live as many of the Apps necessary to interact with society require a smartphone.

I’n sure the blame for this belongs more on the app makers than the device manufacturers, but I think it’s still an answer to what your asking.

View on HN

The problem is: how well can you interact with a phone the size of a watch? I mean, for some things, yeah, it works fine. But other things? There's a reason why phones have been getting larger (no iPhone Minis anymore). Even Android side, expect Google to always assume there's a companion phone available, because the interface for adding in info will continue to be terrible, simply due to form factor constraints.

Watch projects a screen and gestures.

This is more convenient than carrying a phone, is it? Gonna project your work on the wall of the subway on the way into the office?

Or glasses get small enough. Gesture and voice will continue to improve. Apple Vision Pro (and other AR devices) will continue to improve. It's not hard to see a path where today's phone format goes away and/or becomes used only for certain situations.

Voice.

I don't think there is a blame to put on app-makers. The Apple Watch is a companion-product by design.

Apple's target-group for the Watch is every iPhone user, they know that with patience they can sell an Apple Watch to every iPhone user out there.

So there's little incentive for Apple to create a Watch that doesn't require an iPhone, and little reason for app-developers to assume you own a Watch but NO iPhone...

I agree. The Apple Watch is very useful, but I'm not happy about having to buy an iPhone to go with it. With luck the Pixel watches might become good enough to replace it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com