Strict enforcement of basic rules against a subset of the population while letting off other groups is a major contributor to the lack of civic sense.
Strict enforcement of basic rules against a subset of the population while letting off other groups is a major contributor to the lack of civic sense.
[1]: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/696355
[2]: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2022/12/22/policing_survey...
[3]: https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/About-APA/Organiza...
Hi woodruffw - what group is disproportionaly likely to kill or brutalize law enforcement? What happens when you correct for that?
When you stop and think about the bigger picture, clearly it's the food banks that are responsible. By letting the homeless scum of the earth get food twice a week, we give them the feces that will just be maliciously defecated upon streets and in our businesses. Clearly we should be closing them down to preserve a nice to live in society.
So are you opening up your home for a total stranger to relief themselves? Why not? You seem much kinder than us folks. If enough people living in cities with this issue open up their homes to strangers in need, we won't have this issue in the first place.
I will be waiting for the eventual proof that you do so.
Hyperbole requires hyperbole ;)
By basic civic laws, I mean things like not allowing open air drug markets in downtown:
Very recent video
https://v.redd.it/x87v0nws5anb1
FFS, if you have an open air drug market, it doesn't really matter if there are public restrooms. This is one major reason why BART boarded up their restrooms in downtown SF.
We live in a society where we can't have public restrooms and progressives (including virtually half the commenters here!) think that we're being too mean to vagrants. Just incredible.
Why are Tokyo and Singapore nice cities? What would they do if someone was shooting up in the streets in front of children?