Hacker News Reader

Zinc-air is a primary cell. Once discharged you throw it out. This means external infrastructure to support recycling. What is the agenda of people pushing a poorly written thing like this? Not gonna lie, I broke a personal rule reading something with "could" in the title.

View on HN

>"Rechargeable zinc-air batteries (ZABs) are becoming more appealing because of their low cost, environmental friendliness, high theoretical energy density, and inherent safety," Dr Muhammad Rizwan Azhar said.

From the article there. They cover that rechargeable zinc-air batteries exist and that is what this is focused on.

Are we reading the same article? I don't see "could" in the title, and the third paragraph begins with the word, "rechargeable."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com