But the really interesting element is that there are a handful of giants who might choose to come in and buy a stake just for strategic reasons - as listed in the article. But why? It's become very clear that there's no one who can buy arm due to anti-trust, the dream of Windows ARM has kind of died. Google is producing TPUs (not through ARM), Apple has moved a lot of it's silicon in house, MobilEye have done a great job on the self-driving side which ARM has arguably failed to get into. And if it is seriously true that these companies are going to take big stakes for strategic reasons, then why is Softbank even IPOing? They're only selling ~10%, at that scale you could easily see one or two of those tech giants taking the entire thing as a strategic move.
Plus it's a catch-22, if those companies do decide to take a strategic stake, there's almost no liquidity left for the real IPO, if they don't then buying at the IPO will be like trying catch a falling knife surely?
I know Softbank say they love ARM and they want to keep a big stake because they think it's really valuable. But really, it looks to me more like they over-valued it repeatedly. They paid over the odds to take it private at $32Bn in 2016 at a time where they were just spewing money. 4 years later they think they can offload it to Nvidia for $40Bn. Which is weird right? That's not a fantastic return at all. Then here we are in 2023, Softbank acquires the vision fund's stake of 25% valuing it at $64Bn which just seems absolutely crazy, so they bought 25% for $64Bn this year and now they want to sell 10% at somewhere close to $54Bn? Doesn't that seem pretty shady? Just one more example of Softbank getting into weird situations when matching their investments up against reality. My guess is they float a tiny amount because they're worried about downward pressure on the price, but they need to sell so they'll proceed to dump much more over time causing massive headwinds for the stock for the next few years.