Nevertheless, as the article also highlights, this approach is unlikely to have favorable long-term financial implications for the state.
Nevertheless, as the article also highlights, this approach is unlikely to have favorable long-term financial implications for the state.
I often wonder how far away we are from funding being withheld from states with bad public policy as perceived by the party in power. It sets dangerous precedents of coupling human suffering to policy maneuvers (which I realize, happens even today, but in broader strokes NY gets hurricane assistance same as Florida. Imagine a scenario where Florida's general public is punished because of laws on their books, or New York public is punished because of policies it has etc.)
This has been going on for many years. From GOP states refusing to accept expanded Obamacare grants, thereby restricting access to healthcare for the poor to refusing to extend 9/11 first responder healthcare until people like Jon Stewart got involved, oppression and cruelty has been used as leverage in policymaking going back to the founding of the US.
Welcome to the future: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Flood_Insurance_Progr...
Congress has been bailing out the program for almost 20 years now.