Isn't wind created by temperature and pressure differentials between regions? How much is due to earth's rotation?
Look up Hadley cells. https://groups.seas.harvard.edu/climate/eli/research/equable...
Warm air rises near the tropics, rotating with the Earth. It then goes towards the temperate zone, still rotating with the Earth to form the jet stream. It then falls, creating the trade winds as it slows down. It then is sucked back towards the tropics, creating a reverse trade wind because it is only going as fast as the temperate zone. And then it rises, completing the cycle.
The prevailing wind in both temperate zones and the tropics is therefore due to the Earth's rotation.
Wind energy is solar energy once removed.
Wave energy is solar energy twice removed (solar -> wind -> waves).
Ditto for hurricanes. Hurricanes turn rising/falling air into cycling air into hurricane force winds because the Earth rotates. But the energy for it came from the Sun. Often removed by another factor, Sun warms ocean, ocean drives the storm.
Earth's rotation directs the energy imbued by the Sun, much as ductwork directs airflow through a structure imbued by blower motors.
But neither wind, nor ducted airflow, originate from, are driven by, or otherwise exhaust the Earth's rotation, or the containing ductwork, respectively.
(Yes, there are frictional forces of the atmosphere against the Earth's surface. On balance these probably net out, as atmospheric flows at large scale are balanced, else we'd end up with a zone of vacuum and one of infinite pressure on the Earth's surface.)
The original question was "How much [wind] is due to earth's rotation?", in the context of whether or not wind is a renewable energy resource. Given that wind is fundamentally driven by solar flux, wind is renewable, and it is not driven (vs. directed or influenced) in any meaningful way by Earth's rotation.
In practice, wave action is caused by fetches across hundreds or thousands of kilometres of sea surface, and even offshore wind farms tend to be located within a few km of shorelines.
As with other impacts described, the potential interactions with bird life (strikes, kills, behavioural disruption), and of the artificial-reef effects of offshore turbine foundations and anchorages (probably largely positive) would all but certainly dominate these by many orders of magnitude.
It would take quite a lot of planning and work but maybe there are ways to mitigate these losses by balancing out the effects between different processes. Typically nature finds such dynamic equilibria as a matter of course -- I suspect anything humans attempt to control will not be as resilient or sound.