> What were you using on X that made you healthy?
Well my WM for a start. It did not migrate to Wayland.
And I also need to share screen from time to time (teams, Google chat, etc), which results in a dark screen for viewers in Wayland.
Well my WM for a start. It did not migrate to Wayland.
And I also need to share screen from time to time (teams, Google chat, etc), which results in a dark screen for viewers in Wayland.
Any updates from Microsoft on this issue?
Since Chrome/Chromium supports screen sharing with Wayland, it simply just works for me nowy while it never worked with the Elecrton-based desktop application.
Thankfully, my employer uses Google Meet for most of the meetings.
* Have they posted what is blocking them? Besides a lack of hands on keyboards?
I am trying to narrow down exactly what the issues are. Too much of the conversation is 'something' is broken in Wayland because of 'something'.
I think overall the problem with Wayland is that there is no user facing improvement over X that I know of.
I have no doubt it's more modern, better engineered, or whatelse. But in the end, the days of fiddling endlessly with your xorg.conf are over, and X _just works_ out of the box on any distro / device.
All Wayland bring me is a switch of WM, and some bugs when screensharing, for no visible benefit.
The only hope of value add I can see with Wayland would be per-monitor DPI. But last I checked, it was hackish at best.