Your response below did not address the substance of my argument. I linked to primary sources, people interested in this discussion can go read them and come to their own conclusions.
Just people disagreeing about where to draw the line on what censorship is acceptable and what is not. The US and NZ draw that line in different places.
It seems to me that Americans in this discussion are trying to win some kind of moral argument, where as I'm just explaining how the world is, not how it ought to be.