I usually catch them when I scroll down my usage statements once per month, but having it in-your-face would be beneficial to quite a lot of people I think.
I usually catch them when I scroll down my usage statements once per month, but having it in-your-face would be beneficial to quite a lot of people I think.
So if they don't show any analysis there's a higher chance they don't analyse it internally for their private use either. I hope.
Then, I either dismiss the message, or deal with it immediately. I find this much easier than going over a statement at the end of the month. Usually the context for the charge is front and center, instead of and puzzling whether "AMZN MKTP US*TO10VLA93" is something I really bought 28 days ago or if someone used my CC.
However, it is also true that when it comes to commercial accounts, pricing for certain options like SMS may still follow the original scheme--i.e. the telecom may charge a fixed amount per individual message. I'm not saying this is definitely the case, nor that it is reasonable, if it is the case (the contention early on was that SMS were part of some other communication that occurred automatically, so people should never have had to pay anything for this "service," which was periodically ongoing by default). I'm just pointing out that this is how it used to be for private accounts, and i wouldn't be surprised if it was still the case for commercial accounts.
As far as banking goes, I tried mightily to use BillPay for everything possible (push) rather than AutoPay (pull) but those services are ruthless and relentless, so I gave up, and I am down to only one monthly BillPay remittance.