That is inane and witless. It throws away any kind of intelligent informed view and reduces it all to a cheap emotive sloganeering.
Rightsholders are not entitled to control what people do with information -- they are granted special commercial rights, and not for their own benefit but because such an arrangement is intented to encourage production for people to use/enjoy overall. The purpose is not to deny people or restrict people -- exactly the opposite. The aim is to have no more restriction than needed.
This is just the standard rational understanding. It is not difficult to find.
And it follows that if people do feel inordinately restricted or inconvenienced, the system is not functioning well and needs adjustment or fixing.