Thanks for the feedback. It's a bit strong, indeed; I've just used the format for so long (normally with great success — even tested it at some point prior to this incident happening) that I hadn't considered the pollution until you brought it up. I'll trim it moving forward.
I realize this is harsh, but I'd rather not sugarcoat. Your resume, by area, is like 75% crap and 25% really genuinely good experience. I would take that 25% and stretch it out as much as you can.
>Saved the company more than $600,000 by optimizing infrastructure costs.
Wait, what? Expand on that, my brother! That's a huge win which one should be proud of, I think that could easily be two bullet points. "Optimizing infrastructure costs" is very weak - did you move to a different cloud provider?
I don't doubt you're a strong engineer, I think if you fix the resume you'll get callbacks almost immediately.