dont say it if you dont like the aftertaste.
lawsuits have occured over similar conditions ending in favor of account holders.
Dropbox could be in for some fun times.
dont say it if you dont like the aftertaste.
lawsuits have occured over similar conditions ending in favor of account holders.
Dropbox could be in for some fun times.
Except now you'll be worrying about some unknown arbitrary limit, and hoping you never discover how much it is.
I find your comment interesting... And self conflicting. Let's us ask this question: is setting the abuse "tripping point" at a usage level of 1%, or 0.1% or 0.01% (heck, choose your favourite number)... arbitrary?
And a follow up question: Even if everybody was a genuine good actor (in an imaginary world where sins such as hate, fraud, stealing didn't exist) and was using the storage only for legitimate uses (for any definition of legitimate), would we still end with inequality between the storage usage... And thus, with the 1%, or 0.1% or 0.01% or "any arbitrary value" usage users?
And finally: have you considered that, perhaps, we are wrong?
Yours sounds like the Newspeak definition, not the English one. War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, unlimited is limited.
Unlimited - not limited or restricted in terms of number, quantity, or extent.
Companies don't get to redefine words to their benefit.