I don't suggest otherwise. It's known that Python is one of Google's three languages approved for internal use (or apparently four now that JS has got a foothold). But I'm sure I've seen reports that people are nonetheless being pushed towards Google's other two officially blessed languages, at least on production code - and in fairness, Google is a place where developer time is often cheaper than the machine time you have to spend to save developer time. But moveover it seems that, even when people in Google do want to fix their Python performance issues by making Python perform better rather than by reducing its use, they tend to want to do it in-house rather than by adopting or supporting other people's work: look at Unladen Swallow. That would be in line with the rather hubristic, command-economy approach - "let's hire all the world's smartest people, then order them to build the future" - that seems to determine Google's actions in general. Hiring GvR fits that pattern too (as well as making plenty of sense).
But I'm sure other people here are much better informed about this than I am.
This creates a dilemma for a lot of people while choosing a technology. If you have to choose a language where you don't want to develop stuff quickly. Then you now have sufficient time to choose a static language and then develop stuff at the speed desired.
For other quick stuff there is Perl anyway.And it doesn't make sense to use Python, which is slow(compared to java), which doesn't give quick development cycle(compared to perl).
If you wish to relevant for a long time, then you have to do at least one thing properly.
It is. When you launch Visual Studio >= 2010 it's there alongside C# in the Project Creation wizard.
IIRC, the original research was going to be into making Haskell for .Net, but there were enough issues (in particular, being purely functional makes interop with C# and the existing .Net libraries radically more difficult) that ML seemed like a better fit.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/hh388569
Microsoft also sponsors Haskell and OCaml research via Microsoft Research centers.
Java and C# helped their companies do that.
But with Python,Tcl and Haskell its a little different. Its good for the companies if they off, but if they don't they don't loose anything.