Around 1,800 space launches (including USSR) vs 1,500 USA. And they seem to be increasing the frequency of launches.
Around 1,800 space launches (including USSR) vs 1,500 USA. And they seem to be increasing the frequency of launches.
Angara and Soyuz-5 are designed to be reusable to some extent.
If you want to say something is obsolete, you need to be more specific. I'm sure a lot of "1960s design[s]" are state of the art.
It's an easy trap to fall into, but a dangerous one. We've also seen it manifested in the war prognosticating ("they're a bunch of drunks who will run out of missiles soon!"). Well, apparently there are some sober ones.
So is patronising people on the internet, it seems.
I'm going to leave it there.
And sure, there’s plenty to criticize about Russian politics but that doesn’t mean they aren’t a space contender.
Heck, replace Russia with India. India has a ton of basic problems but that is not stopping them from competing.
I mean I'm not sure if this is true.
They until recently sold around 100 RD-180 rockets to the US - none of which experienced issues. Not to mention putting US astronauts into space.
Russia is one of the few nations that actually have the history, engineering talent, finances and the raw resources to compete.
Plus, it's been widely reported that Russian military industrial output is way up with factories working 3 shifts, etc. We are not talking about illiterate Afghanis.