Hacker News Reader

For those looking to understand some of the history of the anti-systemd feelings, I found this presentation useful: The Tragedy of systemd (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo)

View on HN

Another one - https://www.theregister.com/2014/04/05/torvalds_sievers_dust...

So the objection here is what….. bugs?

Is the implication that systemd has bugs and nothing else does? If so that’s nonsensical.

I have to wonder, if an in-depth explanation is needed to say why it's bad, then is it really that bad?

I have been using Debian for a long time, and I moved to systemd when they switched and I have not had any issues with it that I can think of.

The presentation doesn't really say it's bad. The presenter just gives a context of why it has stirred up so much controversy, and how it has the potential to improve the way things are done on Linux.

The presentation is more of a defense of systemd

Reply on news.ycombinator.com