The case is clear, why go after the little funding available? Is anyone really convinced that white men as a whole are disadvantaged because they can’t get funding from these three black women?
It’s even worse that it’s women going after other women.
Of all the startups I’ve
worked for I’ve never been able to say that my CEO was a black, white or Asian woman. That’s not some mistake.
EDIT: understandably this has been locked for replies (by the powers that be not me). So before asking any question note that I will not be able to reply once the edit button expires. AAAAAND I can reply again.
But disappointed tbh, but I understand
Uniformity or a pattern isn’t a requirement for an argument, consistency is. And I’m consistent about the idea that people who are doing great in one area shouldn’t be pushing down other people trying to get to the same place.
Ahh yes, it must be the evil white women who put the Asian woman up to this.
> Uniformity or a pattern isn’t a requirement for an argument, consistency is. And I’m consistent about the idea that people who are doing great in one area shouldn’t be pushing down other people trying to get to the same place.
I'm sure you are quite consistent in your racism.
Why would they have to be both advantaged and a majority? Surely just being advantaged would suffice, and white women are also not a majority in VC funding, nor are they advantaged.
Women-funded startups received only 9% of investments - even if all of that 9% went to only white women, they would still be disadvantaged. Furthermore, 77.1% of founders were white, and 17.7% were Asian. Since whites are 57.8% of US, but Asians are 5.9%, that makes whites 1.33x over-represented, and Asians 3x over-represented.
In other words, Asians are 2.26x more likely to receive VC funding than whites, yet, without citing any data, you claimed they are less favored than whites.
Source: https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/untapped-opportunity-min...
You'll notice this with any kind of woke endeavor - white women are almost always at the helm and they won't tolerate being put in the backseat.
This group can't stand black people working for other black people and they have to attack them and shut it down.
Don't be confused by your anti woke bias. This isn't it.
I’m not that kind of liberal or conservative.
So I like your idea but add the word systemic. What I mean is I can wait 5 minutes to go for the bathroom.
So there was a system in the restaurant that kept me from going to the bathroom no matter how long I wait (i.e they only let women go to the bathrooms) I can’t claim I was discriminated.
You haven't even addressed what the commenter actually sayed. Or you chose not to adress it or probably didn't understand.
Read it again you mite get it this time.