[flagged]
2. If you're actually confused on this subject, and are asking in good faith, I would recommend starting your research with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
It will provide you with a rough frame of taking this argument to an extreme, by demonstrating that various groups of people need to set some kind of non-zero, practical limits for behaviours they permit.
This particular group of people sets very particular, practical limits for those behaviours, enforced by the moderation team.
The paradox of tolerance is what I'm operating off of too. My conclusion is that you can't hate the hateful without being hateful yourself. What's your conclusion? That you're always automatically on the right side so it's okay to be intolerant? Where's the paradox for you? It's a 'you can't have your cake and eat it too' thing. What are you giving up, exactly?
You shift very subtly from talking about beliefs to behaviors here. I'm specifically asking about beliefs, because the behavior in question here is the expression of beliefs. You're speaking out here against a group. Why shouldn't you be deplatformed? Why should we tolerate your intolerance?
You don't seem to understand what the paradox of tolerance is. You're also creating a strawman. No one thinks hate is inherently bad. Lots of people deserve to be hated for their actions. What people are opposed to is hate for people's immutable characteristics, backgrounds, or harmless life choices.
>You're speaking out here against a group. Why shouldn't you be deplatformed? Why should we tolerate your intolerance?
I'm not OP but it's because we're humans with brains who can make distinctions between groups that have odious opinion and those who don't.
Your arguments are really basic and if you're really curious you could spend some time reading about this subject instead of making arguments that would sound profound to a college freshman.
I don't care if you hate me, by some old group definition or by something you've just made up, and you need way worse insults for me to hate you back.
Cool, I don't really believe you, but if that's the case, you're in the extreme (nonexistant) minority
>People who hate will come to experience it as the truth.
Literally every human who has ever lived hates things. I think you probably perceive what you're saying as profound, but it's actually meaningless. I hate Nazis for the Holocaust. I'm not coming "to experience it as the truth". I hate them because it is the truth.
>You don't address my arguments, you just create more groups of people to hate and to feel better than
LOL yes I did. You can reject basic reality, but I did address your "arguments"
> don't care if you hate me, by some old group definition or by something you've just made up, and you need way worse insults for me to hate you back
Bro bro, your victim complex is out of control Did you somehow skip to a later part of your canned argument? What makes you think I hate you? I can guess that you're probably a youngish radicalized white guy, but I don't know enough about you to hate you. Can you stop trying to manufacture drama and focus on doing something productive?
It seems like you really intensely agree with me on the experiencing-hate-as-truth thing. So I will just leave that there.
You hate those groups you are assigning me to, or else you wouldn't be using them as an insult. Like you said, you don't know me. Your insults reveal only information about you.
I encourage you to broaden your horizons. Get off the internet and read some long-form books. Your position isn't profound or even interesting. Your basic assumptions are wrong and no matter what flowery language you use to dress it up, it's still a silly juvenile argument.