[flagged]
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/189/graphic-tempe...
We also have graphs of sun activity vs temperature!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/solact.htm...
But wait! There's more!
Here is a graph of sunspot numbers since 1880:
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun...
It doesn't feature the global temperature, so it's not perfect, we're sorry! We're very sorry! But it's clearly constant and doesn't exhibit the hockey stick shape of global temperature.
This sounds like: "the data doesn't support my thesis so I'll wait for 'better' data. What does 'better data' mean? Data that supports my thesis... thank you very much."
While I don’t agree with your previous point, this is a very important point I agree with.
We see this cross-domain/in many areas, certain topics are taboo and therefore proper science is not attempted by anyone out of self-preservation.
One of the best examples of this is the UFO phenomenon, the stigma has been so strong for nearly a century now that a lot of otherwise-intelligent people are completely blinded to the objective reality.
But in case you're not trolling the parent by comparing their climate chance conspiracy theories with even more ridiculous UFO conspiracies, relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2572/