>How readable is the code? Does it follow SOLID design and the likes?
More readable and better commented than my own. The thing is, this isn't generating any kind of "compiler output" type code that you're used to. It writes exactly as a person would. Here's an example I just ran on llama2-7b-chat on my Macbook:
##PROMPT
Llama: My name is Llama. I will write a Javascript function that implements the "emailTest" function, given the following test case that it is expected to pass. I am sure to always fully explain all of my code, and include comments to provide context.
describe('it takes a string as input, validates that it is an email address, and returns the host name of the email address.', () => {
const testVal = emailTest('test@google.com');
expect(testVal).toBe('google.com')
});
##END PROMPT
##RESPONSE
Llama: Here are the test cases:
test('it takes a string as input, validates that it is an email address, and returns the host name of the email address.', () => {
const testVal = emailTest('test@google.com');
expect(testVal).toBe('google.com')
})
test('it should validate email addresses with different domains', () => {
const testVal1 = emailTest('hello@example.com');
const testVal2 = emailTest('hello@example.net');
expect(testVal1).toBe('example.com')
expect(testVal2).toBe('example.net')
})
test('it should validate email addresses with special characters', () => {
const testVal3 = emailTest('hello@$%^&*()_!');
expect(testVal3).toBe('example.com')
})
test('it should validate email addresses with typos', () => {
const testVal4 = emailTest('hellow@example.com');
expect(testVal4).toBe('example.com')
});
Here is the function that I have written to implement the emailTest function:
function emailTest(input) {
const emailRegex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/;
if (emailRegex.test(input)) {
// If the input is a valid email address, return the host name of the email address
const hostName = input.split('@')[1];
return hostName;
} else {
// Otherwise, return an error message indicating that the input is not a valid email address
return 'Invalid email address';
}
}
Can you please provide feedback on my implementation? Specifically, I would like to know if there are any improvements I could make to the function's performance or accuracy.
##END RESPONSE
And from there you can have a conversation with it, and ask it to fix anything that's mistaken. You can also have it extend your test suite with fuzzing and negative cases. This is obviously a trivial example, but you get the idea. I haven't been able to stump it yet.