There's a 1/5 chance of developing Long COVID, and 1/4 change of your Long COVID lasting >1yr. Studies have shown repeated exposure to COVID causes _more_ organ damage, does _not_ increase immunity, and _increases_ risk of developing Long COVID.
There's never been a question about efficacy of masks. We all know masks work, and they work best when everyone is wearing them correctly.
Absolutely wrong. There is no evidence that the typical masks worn prevent any spread. There is some evidence that N95s prevent spread, but most people don't wear those.
https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/providers/do-masks-really-p...
I'll also wager when they're talking about masks, they're talking about N95 or better masks.
Edit: Oh, shit what do you know. They're wearing a P100 respirator.
“After all masking and public health measures stopped SARS-1 in its tracks in Toronto, I would view the Cochrane Library meta-analysis findings with a large degree of skepticism.”
and buried within: “Meta-analysis is a less than optimal methodology to apply to the issue of masking. Almost all included studies varied widely in their methodology, since it is very hard to ethically have a non-masking control group.”Sounds excessive and honestly a bit obsessive.
I just followed the government recommendations, wore masks when mandatory, and went to restaurants the minute they were allowed to reopen, and have not caught covid either.
Do you live in a place where covid is still a big risk? Or do you work in a place with higher risks, like healthcare related?
Unfortunately, today's open-office environments and return-to-office mandates are squeezing everyone together just like we were pre-pandemic, including multiple hour-long meetings a day with packed meeting rooms.
If just 1 person present has COVID then those become high-risk environments. And it's happened - we have a large meeting, then the next week multiple people are out sick :(
It sucks. I don't enjoy wearing a mask, I want to eat meals out and go to happy hour, I want to not have to think about the relative risk of every outing and errand. But since the world had decided COVID is not a concern anymore it's left each of us to do their own personal risk management.
I really want to see a "cure" developed to treat/prevent the damage from COVID and or for COVID to evolve into something much more mild like the flu (ha!) which doesn't cause lasting damage. Alas, it is a crapshoot as to what happens when you catch COVID, and it changes each time.
If you're going to wear a mask, do it right - you need at least a real N95 (head straps, not ear straps). The GVS respirator is more comfortable, better fitting, and less breathing resistance than a disposable N95.
Flew on a plane earlier this year and I definitely did.
Also always still wear masks in actual healthcare settings or wherever else that I'm asked.
Asking for proof of efficacy in the middle of a pandemic when millions of people are dying is also really weird. My brain might be strange, but it makes me imagine a solider asking for proof of efficacy of covering fire in a war or something like that (and our hospitals definitely turned into a warzone in the middle of the pandemic). Its a temporary restriction to deal with an active threat.
Time-travel would make this an effective strategy in a public health context. Until that is developed, a "better safe than sorry" strategy is a perfectly reasonable approach. The entire point of representative government is to outsource difficult decisions to folks who can spend their time going through the details of very challenging trade-offs while the rest of us, you know, go to work.