might be because Nubank is a brazilian company and in Brazil, English isn't the first language.
> We are continuously growing globally, with more than 7,000 employees of over 46 nationalities. We are present in 7 countries: Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, also where we have operations, and Argentina, Uruguay, the United States, and Germany, where we have our tech hubs.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/nubank/people/?keywords=Sof...
Where they live
1,618 Brazil
1,126 São Paulo, Brazil
861 Greater São Paulo Area
795 São Paulo, SP
113 Mexico
I don’t "think" anything; I wrote "their tech hubs are not based in Brazil", which is exactly what is stated on their website.
Yup, won't disagree with you on that one.
>which is exactly what is stated on their website.
Really? Curious to see where they say that. Let's try ddg: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=where+are+nubank+tech+hubs&t=canon..., the first result is:
>Get to know Nubank’s main headquarters in Pinheiros, Sao Paulo/Brazil https://building.nubank.com.br/nubank-office-pinheiros/
Maybe their About page:
>We have offices or technology hubs in six countries, and our staff is composed of around 8,000 Nubankers from over 50 different nationalities (as of December 2022). https://international.nubank.com.br/about/
Okay, I give up.
> Still surprising to see a poorly written piece of text.
What's the subject of this sentence fragment? Are you relying on a colloquial implied "It" (as in "It's still...") or perhaps you are talking about your own surprise, e.g. "I still find it surprising..."?
> Nubank's comm leadership
Is this some slang for PR department? Or maybe Communications Team leadership?
> would have an extensive language background in English
I'm sorry, I don't follow at all. Hazarding a guess by rearranging the words a bit - do you mean: "would have an extensive background in the English language"?
I'm not sure how you can determine the background of someone by how fluently they can write a language - particularly when the piece in question is written better than what most college students in the US can produce.
> I'm not sure how you can determine the background of someone by how fluently they can write a language - particularly when the piece in question is written better than what most college students in the US can produce.
Perhaps not so much grammatically, but the text intonation and others parts of the text do not give the proper formal tone of the comm.
> when the piece in question is written better than what most college students in the US can produce.
As if this piece of information is some high bar to overcome.