Since inception nobody said that IME was for the user. Nobody said that Palladium is for the user. Google arguments are all propaganda. Nicey nicey words for the people.
Judging about the amount of recent pressure on open source, and encryption we are already toasted. Cyber resilience act, earn it act, patriot act, restrict act. It is all written using nice words, but I am interested in effect. It is all about crypto wars, and taking possession of your computer. About limiting anonymity and privacy using only arguments against it.
Big companies already have monopoly. They can already shadow ban, ban users, decrease reach of comments, track users using fingerprinting, cookies etc. They can decide what is acceptable, what is not, what is a social norm, what is not, what is a conspiracy theory, and not. Why do they need also breaking the encryption, or force signed software? Why they require more control? Because they can. Corporations lobby for more power, they receive more power. Where is the limit? Government also only benefits from corporations accumulating more powah.
I do not understand how people may think about how 'good' these things will bring, because on the scales there is something really terrifying - a Government that can spy on you without any problems, where you cannot hide. Through surveillance laundering, where government buys user data. Through censorship where government can moderate anything it wants to through hidden portals for the government [1]. Maybe the problem is that the western world never really experience communism.
[1] https://reclaimthenet.org/new-zealand-government-facebook-co...
By the way. I understand the difference between moderation and censorship