Counter argument: selling off products to smaller businesses creates more limited liability. I.e less to lose more to gain by being bad stewards. A bigger company in fear of hurting their brand has incentive to be good.
>smaller businesses creates more limited liability. I.e less to lose more to gain by being bad stewards.
Nonsense. A thousand small CEOs have limited liability to not lose their sole home if they do bad things that harm everyone and get shut down. A single Giant CEO has limited liability to go back to his six mansions in his chauffeured lamborgini that picked him up from his private plane.
Not saying its good or bad - just how it seems. Companies out of the limelight and too small to notice have more leeway to cheat.