I really wish desktop PC power supplies would support such a thing. It seems stupid that we need to use a UPS with an inverter when the power supply should be rigged to accept DC input straight from a battery.
I worked for an ISP that was also a CLEC back in late 90s / early 2000s. All of the telco side was DC (massive 48v battery banks) - so when we were doing server implementation it made sense to get all DC PSU on the servers. Not sure why DC PSU aren't a more universal option as you'd think UPS providers could easily offer DC output models.
There are options out there, I ran across this [0] looking for typical ATX DC to DC PSU.
UPS systems start connecting the batteries in series to provide higher voltages for this reason
just ditch the 110 outlets for usb-a or usb-c ports and skip the inverter.
I'd love to power a pi or 3 from ups-based usb ports.
These cheaper ones just provide 9V and 12V output to power a fibre and/or WiFi router, as well as 5V USB-A, and start at around 30Wh capacity - some for less than USD 20. If you pay a little more, you can get 24/48V PoE included as well.
Unfortunately, ones providing USB-PD are quite rare. You do get "power stations" [2] with USB-PD (in addition to an AC inverter). These are typically USD 100 - USD 1000, and have much larger capacity.
Examples (I haven't tested these and do not specifically recommend them):
[1]: https://www.amazon.com/Lithium-Battery-Appliance-Monitor-uni...
[2]: https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Solar-Panel-Power-Station-Ge...
An external/easily replaceable battery would be excellent come time to deal with cell age
Leaving as-is for feedback. I don't get the controversy. I could've been a jerk and said just buy a UPS - this is an established concept.
Edit: thank you kind souls for restoring the imbalance - carry on :D
Definitely a bit paranoid - even if I'd prefer to call it robust :)
I've had very bad luck in this regard... but haven't honestly used a laptop in probably a decade. I was pleasantly surprised to see my latest (dust-collecting) Lenovo will stop somewhere around 80%!
Point being, sure - there are safety things... but batteries are consumables. I like these things to be easy-to-replace!
I find these being difficult to replace accelerates this pattern of obsoleting. CPUs and (especially disks) tend to pack plenty of punch/life, these days - well beyond the mechanical/chemical things they depend on.
Something to ponder - these chips may see particularly long use, being so power efficient. The utility bill won't be such a driver, sipping power and parallelizing decently.
Replaceable, consumable batteries often get thrown out in the trash. ... and can set garbage trucks and recycling centers on fire.
https://www.waste360.com/safety/lithium-ion-batteries-are-ca...
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/local/2023/02/09/garbage...
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/12/recycling-firm-fined...
https://gothamist.com/news/lithium-ion-batteries-a-growing-f...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-29/garbage-truck-fires-c...
(and many more)
How does one make sure that removable, consumable, high capacity batteries are not discarded as trash but instead taken to the proper facilities to handle them?
[1] https://www.recyclingmagazin.de/2023/07/17/das-ungenutzte-po...
However, having just taken an entire stroller out of my shared duplex recycling bin, I know there will never be an ethical way to get 100% of people to care enough to dispose of waste properly.
The AA lithium ion batteries getting tossed into the trash and setting garbage trucks on fire are problematic enough. The energy capacity of a cell phone is quite a bit more and correspondingly more spectacular in the combustion.
From iFixit:
https://www.ifixit.com/News/69041/how-batteries-can-catch-fi...
https://www.ifixit.com/News/34034/lithium-ion-batteries-are-...
> USA Today reports that 65 percent of fires at waste facilities in California were started by lithium-ion batteries. In a 2018 survey of 21 waste facilities across California, 86 percent reported a fire at their facility in the last two years, according to the California Products Stewardship Council (CPSC). Of those fires, 56 percent were attributed to batteries, with the remainder attributed to “traditional hazards of combustibles.” In other words, batteries are causing more fires than the oils, fuels, and other hazardous materials of waste management—combined.
> And that’s only the fires actually reported.
How is this relevant? I don't say this to be rude, but this internet phenomenon of relentless pedantry is annoying.
Things tend to make [some degree of] sense when your first reaction isn't to shoot from the hip.
Mains batteries exist - most people should save the effort, get a UPS. Hackers on the other hand... it's kind of silly to ask why. The answer is 'because'.
Anyhow I guess the goal is “because you can”
how ? why would paying for a screen and not use it be cheaper ?