Actually, the bill does not absolve platforms of that responsibility. Let me format the text of the bill's Section 3(b) into something more readable:
> SEC. 3. Duty of care.
>> (b) Limitation.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to require a covered platform to prevent or preclude—
>>> (1) any minor from deliberately and independently searching for, or specifically requesting, content; or
>>> (2) the covered platform or individuals on the platform from providing resources for the prevention or mitigation of suicidal behaviors, substance use, and other harms, including evidence-informed information and clinical resources.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/140...
Section 3(b)(1) is worded in a deceptive way. It does not prevent websites from allowing minors to search for censored content censored by the bill, but the text of the "Limitation" still does not allow websites to display content censored by the bill, even when specifically requested by the minor. Websites would still have a "duty of care" to "prevent and mitigate" anxiety and depression in users and viewers under 18 years of age, as prescribed in Section 3(a)(1), which is something that requires content any adult would find acceptable to be broadly censored.